
Charles Leclerc has downplayed the recent buzz surrounding Lewis Hamilton’s revelation that he’s been sharing technical documents with Ferrari. According to Leclerc, this collaborative approach is not new within the team and aligns with how Ferrari has operated during his tenure. Hamilton’s input is part of a shared effort to enhance the performance of the SF-25, the current car that both drivers have struggled with throughout the season.
Hamilton recently disclosed that he has been regularly providing feedback and suggestions to Ferrari, especially aimed at resolving issues with the SF-25. These documents, meant to influence future car development, particularly the 2026 project, reflect his proactive stance even before officially joining the team. Leclerc confirmed that he is also actively involved in the development process and emphasized that he and Hamilton are united in their goal to improve the team’s competitiveness.
Leclerc elaborated that both he and Hamilton contribute their feedback during extensive meetings with the Ferrari engineering team. The Monegasque driver insisted that this level of engagement is standard practice, and he does not feel threatened or sidelined by Hamilton’s input. Instead, he sees it as a natural part of the collaborative process, with all team members pushing in the same direction.
Reflecting on Hamilton’s background, Leclerc acknowledged the value of the seven-time world champion’s experience at Mercedes. He pointed out that having someone from a different racing culture helps Ferrari identify key areas for improvement. However, Leclerc also stressed that all Ferrari drivers over the years have contributed similarly by highlighting issues and submitting internal reports to enhance team performance.
Ultimately, Leclerc dismissed any suggestion that Hamilton’s recent actions are extraordinary or disruptive. He believes the current attention is only due to Hamilton publicly speaking about his behind-the-scenes involvement for the first time. Leclerc reiterated that this level of communication has existed since the season’s opening rounds, framing it as a normal, constructive process rather than something sensational.