A bombshell claim from a former Ferrari insider has thrown the Scuderia into chaos, alleging that Charles Leclerc’s disastrous race strategy at a pivotal Grand Prix wasn’t incompetence—it was deliberate. The anonymous whistleblower, speaking to a fringe Italian motorsport outlet, claims key decisions were “pre-agreed” to undermine Leclerc’s championship push in favor of internal agendas.
The source alleges that certain senior figures within the Ferrari pit wall engineered pit stop timings and tire choices that looked like tactical blunders but were, in reality, calculated moves. Supposedly, this maneuvering was driven by a political tug-of-war inside the team, where not all parties were aligned on who should lead Ferrari’s future. Such a suggestion doesn’t just dent Ferrari’s public image—it strikes at the heart of their sporting integrity.
Leclerc’s own comments after the race now read like veiled barbs in hindsight. His post-race frustration—carefully worded at the time—hinted at “decisions I can’t understand,” which fans are now dissecting frame by frame in light of these allegations. The revelation has emboldened those who believe the Monegasque has been systematically shortchanged by Ferrari’s inner circle.
Ferrari has issued a firm and immediate denial, branding the claims “ludicrous” and “beneath the dignity of Formula 1.” Yet, their refusal to address the specifics of the allegations has done little to quiet the storm. Instead, it’s become another entry in a growing conspiracy canon surrounding Leclerc’s tenure in red.
Whether this proves to be a paranoid fever dream or the uncovering of one of F1’s most cunning internal plots, the damage is already done—Ferrari’s unity is under public doubt, and every future strategy call will now be viewed through a lens of suspicion.
About the Author
